Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.0 3G 3 and its truncated version, ie Galaxy Tab 7.0 3G Lite 3 are in the market for some time, and despite the recent release of a successor – the Galaxy Tab 4 – still are popular. Check what they stand and whether they are still worthy of attention.
Abbreviation, or wideorecenzja Galaxy Tab 7.0 3G 3 and Table 7 Lite
Construction / quality
Two different Tablets, both made of plastic
Samsung stubbornly sticks to the plastic and you can not hold it against him until the end of the bad, because doing well with this material. Both the basic version of the tablet, and this simplified devices are very nice, but they differ significantly. 3 Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.0 has a shimmering plecki that seem to be black, but in reality it is a very dark garnet visualizing only when viewed against the light. Plastic slightly overlapping the edges, there to meet with a gray border connecting the front to the back. Unfortunately, in one place back plate bends, spending a small creak. Surface easily collects fingerprints, which further enhances the dark color of the device. [Nggallery id = 824 template = techmaniak] A cheaper model is nicer and more practical, as if the manufacturer compensated for losses, which mention a little further in the test. Here we are dealing with material that has been given texture of the skin. Imitation looks great, and at the same time does not collect traces of our fingers. It is no wonder that the Koreans decided to pull further this idea and continue it in the successor series – Galaxy Tab 7.0 4. Since I have the privilege that I can compare the model with Tabem Lite 4, I can see the difference consisting in the separation of plecków of the frame running around the structure. In Table 4 rear panel overlaps the sides, which looks nicer. Amazingly plecki cheaper model does not bend and creak. [Nggallery id = 826 template = techmaniak] The front panels of both models look exactly the same. Lite version does not feature in the front cam. The proportions of the total of the display are the same. Both versions have the control keys on the right edge and the memory card slot and SIM card on the left. Cheaper model schludniejszego lived to see their distribution (one after another), while the standard version of TAB-and has one at the top and one at the bottom. The upper edge is the place to locate the audio output, and – in the case of the Lite version – microUSB socket. Better-featured tablet from, the latter was left on the bottom edge, where we find the stereo speakers.I also have to comment on quality. Both devices to bend, and that's the cause of the plastic housing. Physical buttons have nevertheless been properly placed in the body and this is true both versions. Screen coating likes to bend under the pressure, and the effect of visible spots on the display is clearly higher for the Lite version. If I would, however, tell only one model, it skłaniałbym toward more modest version. It's prettier, it seems to be more thoughtful and more practical.
This section will have the first, significant differences between the tablets. Galaxy Tab 3 has a camera with a resolution of 3 megapixels, while the Lite is equipped with a 2-megapixel system. Not added to any device or flash or auto focus. Both models have received for that same meeting software. Application for snapping photos to choose one of several modes, but nothing like this has to currently available Samsung models, where the multiplicity of these modes is downright frightening. Here you can switch between making a single image, panorama, and smile. You can also go in mode share photos. The program allows you to set the exposure, applying color effects, self-timer and define the measuring mode. We can also determine the white balance and set the scene (postcard, sports, indoor, beach, sunset, dawn, fall color, candle light, rear light and night mode). And how cameras work in practice? Please do not accuse me of monotony gallery of sample images – a relatively tried the same approach to allow maximum chance to compare capabilities of both tablets. 🙂 The samples show that the photographic opportunities both models are similar. Lite version takes pictures with only slightly less vibrant color palette. In both cases, we see problems with rozmywającym the image and the deficiencies in the mapping details. Despite the registration of the video under the same lighting conditions, videos are very different from each other. Galaxy Tab 3 tends to dim the image and Lite scanners. Specifications of individual films are as follows:
| Galaxy Tab 3
|| Galaxy Tab 3 Lite
Sample images: Galaxy Tab 3
Sample images: Galaxy Tab 3 Lite
Video sample Galaxy Tab 3
Video sample Galaxy Tab 3 Lite
The difference is colossal
More expensive Galaxy Tab 3 has a better sensor and displays more pleasant to the eye image. Despite the fact that in both cases, the color palette is very much alive, the display simplified version seems to even poke in the eye. The reason? We are dealing with a direct comparison matrix IPS from TN. The first noticeable wins – has wider viewing angles and the colors are not distorted when viewed on the screen at an angle. This is quite unlike the case of Lite, where we have to use the tablet in a certain position to use the full advantages of the image. Even if we do this, however, the difference between the two displays is still a colossal and can confirm only person who had the chance to see both panels for yourself. Samsung tried tuning TN screen (you can see that it has been raised even contrast to the colors were more vivid), to little avail, however. Both diagonal matrices combined – 7 inches and resolution, which is 1024 by 600 pixels. This will allow you to view pages in landscape mode, but is associated with a relatively low coefficient of density of pixels. The newer model of this series, the Galaxy Tab 4, Samsung implemented IPS screen with a resolution of 1280 by 800 is still not much, but still better. [Wptab style = "4" title = "Galaxy Tab 3 7.0"][/ wptab] [wptab style = "4" title = "Galaxy Tab 7.0 Lite 3"] [ CST_6] [/ wptab] [wptab_end] Both screens have a strong backlight, and this translates into readability in sunlight. Displays a coating strongly reflect light, but strong illumination in this case works in favor of the user. Screen Table-3 has a maximum intensity illumination equal to 408 cd / m 2, but this is the value that occurs at only one point of the screen (in any but does not go below 350 cd / m 2). Minimum illumination is 6 cd / m 2 – a great result, if it is important for you to comfortable handling the device in the dark. The Lite version is not far behind its better counterpart. The matrix is well lit by – 371 cd / m 2 is the result of the maximum, 15 cd / m 2 is the minimum. Non-uniformity of the backlight in the first case is 12 percent, Lite falls by 1 percent better. Both panels support up to 5 pressure points.
The phone and Aero2
Tablets vary in terms of multimedia equipment. The Lite version has a mono speaker located on the back panel. It emits sound with a moderate intensity (73 db), and played music seems muffled. Benefit for the lower tones, but they suffer high. The standard model has stereo speakers, and hence, the sound has a higher intensity (86 db) and better quality. Classic Table 3 podołał even dubstepowi. ,) Low tones are well-mapped, high or not disappeared, and the listening experience can be improved by using a graphic equalizer (available on both models). [Test slug = "wifi-tablet" axis = "minus" product_id = "19962.19964"] Both models feature wireless modules Wi-Fi, but only Table 3 supports two ranges – 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz. This ensures access to more bandwidth, but also requires a suitable router. We checked the sensitivity of the two cards, and the even the last scenario (when the tablets were on a different floor than the router, turned out to be the most difficult) is not accounted for devices challenges: the call was upheld, although access to the Net was strongly limited. For both structures GPS module also supports GLONASS. There is no difference between them in terms of time required for positioning. In both cases, the location information to show in the tablet after less than a minute, but the Lite version offers less accurate data. [Wptab style = "4" title = "Galaxy Tab 3 7.0"][/ wptab] [wptab style = "4" title = "Galaxy Tab 7.0 Lite 3"] [/ wptab] [wptab_end] In addition to the two models we tested were compatible with 3G modems, network Aero2 (I checked, it works). Inserting and removing the SIM card is in the case of the model Lite very difficult and can not do without a pair of tweezers. It is interesting that we can with the tablets make voice calls, and also write SMS messages. Typing text messages on a 7-inch tablet is a pleasure. The keyboard is spacious and thumbs while typing is not bumping against each other, and the handling of the device with one hand is not impossible – just difficult. ,) The quality of voice calls in both cases was very good and my party can not claim any trouble understanding me. The sound of the speaker was clean and clear. None of the tested version of the model is not compatible with accessories OTG, even with the simplest. Both models have for it the same internal memory (8 GB) Lite variety only has the ability to transfer the application to the memory card (sic).
Warranty long runs
Samsung has equipped its models in the cells of varying sizes – basic version has a battery capacity of 4000 mAh, 3600 mAh and simplified. The differences are due to the different energy requirements of tablets, which in turn has its reason (probably) in the different matrices. [Test slug = "battery" virtual = "video-wifi-off, internet-wifi, internet-3g-wifi communicator, load-ac" product_id = "19962.19964"] The measurements made with reduced backlight to 120 cd / m 2 showed that Table 3 allowed for 10 hours watching movies and surfing the web, 8 using Wi-Fi, a poorer turn 7 hours video and 5 hours of internet browsing over Wi-Fi. The results are very promising, and I think there will be any problems that tablets have survived the whole working day without recharging the battery.
Performance / functionality
Two models, one configuration
With a pleasant surprise I noted that both versions have the same layout – Marvell PXA986, which has a dual-core processor based on the Cortex-A9 architecture, clocked at 1.2 GHz. Responsible for the graphics unit is also dual-core Vivante GC1000. The configuration completes both working memory capacity of 1 GB. Both Dead Trigger 2 and Asphalt 8: Airborne has been started by the two tablets. The first title of the work on low detail, but still can be seen some slowdown animation and gently jams. Asphalt 8 suggests medium settings, but it works best on low. None of the models tested does not allow for a fully seamless web browsing. Zoom in and out on going, but scrolling is delayed. You can also see a slight jerking page when scrolling animation. Tablets reproduced 1080p video files, but only at 10Mbps throughput. However, the devices are not compatible with DTS codec. Also, more movies, including 4K, beyond the scope of TAB-s. [Wptab style = "4" title = "Agents"] 1. Browser Tests Tests tablet performance for browsing the web. [Test slug = "peacekeeper" virtual = "peacekeeper-stock" product_id = "19962.19964"] [test slug = "SunSpider" product_id = "19962.19964"] [test slug = "kraken" product_id = "19962.19964 "] [/ wptab] [wptab style =" 4 "title =" System "] 2. Synthetic tests Tests of the system overall performance of the tablet. [Test slug = "quadrant" product_id = "19962.19964"] [test slug = "android-antutu" product_id = "19962.19964"] [test slug = "gfxbench-fill" product_id = "19962.19964"] [ / wptab] [wptab style = "4" title = "Image"] 3. Synthetic tests of the system (graphics) Tests performance tablet with an emphasis on 3D graphics. [Test slug = "gfxbench-fps" virtual = "t-rex-3-offscreen, t-rex-3-onscreen" product_id = "19962.19964"] [test slug = "3dmark" virtual="3dmark-ice-storm-total,3dmark-ice-storm-graphics,3dmark-ice-storm-physics,3dmark-ice-storm-extreme-total,3dmark-ice-storm-extreme-graphics,3dmark-ice-storm-extreme-physics,3dmark-ice-storm-extreme-total,3dmark-ice-storm-extreme-graphics,3dmark-ice-storm-extreme-physics,3dmark-ice-storm-unlimited-total,3dmark-ice-storm-unlimited-graphics,3dmark-ice-storm-unlimited-physics" product_id = "19962.19964"] [test slug = "android-antutu 'product_id =" 19962.19964 "] [/ wptab] [wptab style =" 4 "title =" Movies "] 4th Test Play media playback formats multimedia applications MX Player. Galaxy Tab 3 – mkv, 480p, xvid, 1mbps, he aac, subtitles – mkv, 720p, h264, 600kbps, AAC / MP3 dual audio – MP4, 720p, h264, 3Mbps, aac, – mkv, 720p, h264, 3Mbps, vorbis, subtitles, – mp4, 720p, h264, 6Mbps, ac3 – MKV 1080p h264, 10Mbps, dts, (no support for the codec dts) – MKV 1080p h264, 40Mbps; ( klatkujący picture) – mp4, 4K (3840×2160), h264, 34mbps, (no picture) – mp4, 4K (4096×1716), h264, aac, 35Mbps; (klatkujący image) Galaxy Tab 3 Lite – mkv, 480p, xvid, 1mbps, he aac, subtitles – mkv, 720p, h264, 600kbps, AAC / MP3 dual audio – MP4, 720p, h264, 3Mbps, aac – mkv, 720p, h264, 3Mbps, vorbis, subtitles, – mp4, 720p, h264 , 6Mbps, ac3 – MKV 1080p h264, 10Mbps, dts, (no support for the codec dts) – MKV 1080p h264, 40Mbps; (klatkujący picture) – mp4, 4K (3840×2160), h264, 34mbps, (no picture ) – mp4, 4K (4096×1716), h264, aac, 35Mbps; (Klatkujący image) [/ wptab] [wptab_end]
The system is the largest field for the Samsung. Manufacturer spares no opportunity to accommodate you. Both models are based on the version of Jelly Bean, the Tab 3 Lite has a newer its installment, 4.2.2. Table 3 is based on the Android 4.2.1. Both tablets when you start drew the latest available software, which also provides an efficient update module of the OTA (Over The Air, that is, without the need to connect the device to a computer). The system has been enhanced with graphics overlay Touch Whizz, which strongly changes the form not only of the system but also its functionality. Culture work in both models, there is a exemplary. Devices running steadily, but there are trim and slowdown animation crossing the menu. Both models have an office suite Polaris Office 5, an application to issue voice commands S Voice, Samsung Link for data exchange, as well as S Schedule and application for writing notes. The Lite version has been further enriched by mode and launcher children who need extra download. It completely changes the character of the system and moves in the world of sugary native of LocoRoco (have you heard?). The child may photograph, draw, record songs and play games that have provide you. There is also a dedicated baby store applications. We can also set a time limit for using the tablet. Overall a great thing, if one is a parent or has a lot of younger siblings.
Summary / evaluation / review
Both Interestingly, none perfect
When I started testing tablets, I had hoped that a summary will choose which of them will be better and more cost-effective purchase. In fact, both devices lack the ideal. Following paragraph for paragraph, Lite wins in terms of finish, but in his case we have limited access to the SIM card. Suggesting that the screens, the standard version wins hands down.Multimedia, performance in games and cameras do not help to definitively settle the rivalry, because the differences lie only in the photographic equipment. For overtime can be treated with the test battery performance, and then definitely have won Tab 3 Both models best they shall record in the hands of younger users, which also partly due to the fact that the series of Galaxy Tab 3 is slightly backwards with respect to market realities – especially the available for sale is better Galaxy Tab 4.
Rating Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.0 3G 3
[Temperatura2 product_id = "19962"]
Rating Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.0 3G Lite 3
[Temperatura2 product_id = "19964"]
Easy for me to point out an alternative and it will be the Samsung Galaxy Tab 4, which offers a gently refreshed specification, better solutions to the finish, taken from Lite model, and above all provides a new version of the system (4.4.2) with the next installment of the graphic overlay Samsung. Alternative to the Lite version will be the one of the cheap models, for example MODECOM HD 7001 IC with great performance (for the price) and the Android version KitKat, but also from TN screen of the poorer and weaker color palette is highlighted. Advocates of good design and function of the phone are captured Kiano Elegance 7 3G by Zanetti. [Thank type = "store"] [/ thank you]
no images were found[ CST_20]
no images were found